Agoura Horse Property - Custom & Equestrian Real Estate by Nona Green

 
Monday, April 18, 2016

This letter from the President of The Sierra Club expresses dissapointment that our elected officials are caving in to special interests when it comes to the environment. Board of Supervisors meeting on the matter is May 3, 2016



Disappointment City
This letter begins with a sigh.
A large, loud sigh that implies disappointment. The kind of sigh that follows the news that a friend, someone you expected to be on your side, somebody who always had your back, does something disappointing and inexcusable.
It's also the kind of sigh that says "Here we go again."
In the last few weeks, one of the most important environmental laws for many Californians, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has been under attack at the legislature--again. That law requires developers to honestly disclose the environmental impacts of proposed development projects.
Some developers, including public agencies that build roads, clean up toxic waste, or plan the future, view CEQA as an inconvenience.
Honestly, they're right. It's inconvenient to tell the people who live near a freeway or the site of a new high rise exactly how much pollution that freeway or high rise might create or attract. It's inconvenient to then suggest and put into place measures to make sure that pollution from that road or building is reduced or mitigated.
Honesty and responsibility that take into account that other people share the commons are simply inconvenient.
It would be a much easier world if there was nobody else who mattered and each developer or city government could just build whatever at a whim. Much easier, that is, for the builder.
It wouldn't be much easier for the rest of us, the ones who have to breathe the air near the freeway or walk on the sidewalk near the giant parking garage attached to the high rise. It would be anarchy--polluted anarchy, at that.
And that's why Sierra Club California has been standing guard to protect CEQA from being weakened ever since we were formed. We do it for the rest of us, the Californians who won't rake in the profits or get the annual bonus or job promotion for pushing through a project as fast as possible. We do it for the Californians who have to live with the consequences of the project's impacts on air, water, traffic, walkability, noise, open space, natural areas, and wildlife.
A few weeks ago, the governor attempted to attach a CEQA exemption to funding for toxics cleanup at an abandoned lead battery smelter plant in Southern California. Environmental justice groups, local community groups, and statewide environmental groups (including Sierra Club California) pushed back. The governor (at least for now) backed down. The proposal for the money is moving forward without the CEQA exemption.
Score one for the public good.
Then came another assault on CEQA from the mayor of Los Angeles, Eric Garcetti. This latest assault is carried in a bill authored by Assemblymember Jimmy Gomez.
The bill, Assembly Bill 2356, is the sort of legislation that takes a small flock of attorneys who are CEQA experts to fully understand. Fortunately, there is just such a flock, including Sierra Club California staff and volunteers.
In a nutshell, AB 2356 would change the CEQA law in a way that would allow a city like Los Angeles to let infill planning escape the honest scrutiny and disclosure now required by CEQA.
The result would likely be more pollution without mitigation. It would also counter at least one key court decision that affirmed that CEQA disclosures are important to protect the environment and public health.
We are opposing AB 2356--which is no surprise, really, given our history and mission to protect the environment.
What is a surprise is that this bad bill is coming from our friends.
Eric Garcetti ran for mayor on a platform that promised environmental protection and sensitivity to the need to rein in pollution, including climate pollution.
Jimmy Gomez was once on staff of two of the most environmentally progressive elected officials in Los Angeles County, Mike Feuer and Hilda Solis. He has had good scores on our annual legislative report card on environmental votes.
The bill's proponents argue that the changes in it are needed to achieve a greater good: higher density development that will make for more walkable cities that, in the end, should reduce long-term pollution.
We generally like denser urban development. But why do we have to give up solid, open environmental impact reporting and mitigation to get it?
In the last several years, legislators and the governor have tried to justify their legislative efforts to weaken CEQA by claiming the weakening is needed to achieve some other environmental good. Former Assembly Speaker John Perez and former Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg were particularly fond of ending the legislative session with such bills.
We have never bought the argument that CEQA needs to be sacrificed to achieve environmental progress. Californians deserve honest disclosure and analysis and environmentally better developments. Without the first, we're not persuaded it's likely or possible to consistently get the second.
So when we see another bill from our friends that is presented as an improvement rather than as the attack on public disclosure that it is, we get to work and try to kill the bill.
And, with heavy disappointment, we sigh.
We try not to roll our eyes. But we sigh.

Sincerely,
Kathryn Phillips Signature
Kathryn Phillips
Director
Comments: 0

 
Sunday, April 17, 2016
Image 1 of 1 Click to Enlarge Image

Horses like to sleep in a soft bed just like their owner's do.

How do we solve the problem of having to cut down trees, or having to dispose of tons of soiled bedding?

My horses are not currently in stalls (Lucky to live with my horses on my property with a super large paddock), so I make a big "mattress" of about 1.5 feet of bedding. I noticed that I don't go through bags and bags of bedding like I did when they lived at a barn. I realized that if I routinely forked and turned some of the shavings, a few tosses whenever I thought about it, that I was effectively mulching the shavings, and as they degraded, they turned to a sweet smelling compost. I even preferred this mulch over a new bag of tannic acid smelling shavings (or whatever the shavings producers may be adding to retard mold on the shavings - are there such additives? need to do more homework for another article). The mattress of shavings lasted indefinitely.

Once the mulch is degraded, where it is too fine to withstand moisture and turns into muck when pee'd-on, THEN I add more clean shavings, or rice hulls, which when combined with shavings, seems to forestall the degrading of the bedding.
It gets trickier if your horse lives in a stall most of the time.
To my delight, while I haven't yet verified availability in the United States let alone Southern California, the Swedes have been recycling horse manure into bedding. Ok, I want to be partners with the genius who charges ranchers to pick up their manure, and then sell the stuff back to them as bedding.
Here is an article about a company that is successfly selling recycled manure as bedding: https://www.horsejournals.com/greenscene-agritek-revolution-horse-bedding
Comments: 0

< Back
West Los Angeles Foreclosures Agoura Foreclosures Ventura Foreclosures REO Services REO Inventory Management Conejo Valley REO Los Angeles Dream Home California Dream Home Recently Sold Agoura Short Sales Ventura County Short Sales Los Angeles County Short Sales Agoura Horse Property Newsletter Agoura Real Estate Newsletter
  • Agoura Horse Property Testimonials Nona Green Testimonials
  • California Horse Services Horse Directories
  • Local Agoura Services Local Los Angeles Services
  • Agoura Hills Realtor Nona Green
  • Add us on Facebook
Take a Horse Book, Return a Horse Book
Posted: October 21, 2016
Take a Horse Book, Return a Horse Book Do you love to read? Horse books are our favorite,...
Equestrian Neighborhood Riding Arena Gets New Footing
Posted: September 25, 2016
  Back in 1994, The City of Agoura Hills and the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy...
Introduction to Dressage in Southern California
Posted: September 21, 2016
Introduction to Dressage in Southern California   Southern California is a hotbed...
Reyes Adobe Days - a historical perspective
Posted: September 04, 2016
Before Trump vs. Clinton, before the debate about building a wall, there was no border between...
Gas Company tests pipeline in Agoura Hills
Posted: August 06, 2016
You may have noticed the backhoes and water tanks visiting Chesebro National Park recently....
Horse Keeping for Keeps Is LCP living up to it's Promises
Posted: June 14, 2016
 Agoura Horse Property wrote this article to encourage homeowners to apply for a permit...
Assembly Bill 2356 is a Threat to the Environment.
Posted: April 18, 2016
This letter from the President of The Sierra Club expresses dissapointment that our elected...
Recycled bedding
Posted: April 17, 2016
Horses like to sleep in a soft bed just like their owner's do. How do we solve the problem...
High School Football - dangerous to kids?
Posted: March 18, 2016
To live within proximity of a good school is the desire of most parents. Conejo Valley and...
Magic Johnson Equestrian Center Hearing
Posted: February 16, 2016
Please encourange LA County Regional Planning  to approve this center.  I have...
Year End Tax Break leads to increased Open Space
Posted: December 30, 2015
December 19, 2015 Congress made permanent a tax deduction for land deemed open space....
LA County Data Portal Provides Trail Info
Posted: December 30, 2015
December 30, 2015 Granted you will need ArcGIS or another fancy program to download and...
Landslide Victory - Illece Buckley Weber Reelected
Posted: November 04, 2015
Two Women to Clean up the Mess Illece Buckley Weber and Linda Northrup were elected to...
Own A Landmark Pony Club and Ashram for Sale
Posted: November 04, 2015
On September 1, 2015, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted the Historic...
Monte Nido fights against another tract development by Vintage Homes
Posted: October 20, 2015
Los Angeles Regional Planning will decide today if Matt Osgood's proposed development at...